18 December 2008

merry christmas to me

FINALS ARE OVER. And this wonderful ecstatic feeling is ruined by this:



It couldn't have waited just anouther THREE days for me to leave! No, it had to make my last day of finals worse. Not only did I have to drive 10MPH the whole day everywhere I went, but I slipped down the stairs on rape hill on campus on my way home from getting an A on my last final.









Figures.

15 December 2008

blackberry


So I know I'm spoiled.

I'm lucky that for the last four years, I get a company phone from my dad. And although I feel like the company switches phones every six months, I've always had a good cell phone.

And now I found my favorite thing ever.

The blackberry. Not only does it have way cool features (like email--I get my emails RIGHT AWAY! its AMAZING!), but there's blackberry messenger, brickbreaker (the game i'm addicted to--current score, 17,940), and GPS.

NOW there's something that should not have been created.

It's so bad for me.


It is awesome.

Here's what my facebook screen looks like:


Again.. It's so bad for me. Now, whenever someone messages on my facebook, or comments on my photos or status, I get a text message of sorts. I LOVE it!

absurdly late nights (installment 2)

Finals week is insane.

Every night, I have been up until 2am studying.

Mostly at the library.

I have been surprised at my work ethic for finals week.

I, at this point, have 3 finals down, 2 to go.

My last two aren't that stressful.

But.... STORY!

For my most-detested class of the semester, ("Hearing Tests and Measures" is it's title), not only did my teacher switch the method in which he gives tests (from 6 or 7 short essays, to 150 MC questions), but he required the completion of one final lab, in which we needed the correct answers to complete portions of the test correctly. This wouldn't be so bad if we had been graded on earlier labs based on accuracy instead of effort!! I NEVER got the labs. I would work hours on them, but my answers were always wrong. As my last final effort for every lab, I would talk to the TAs and figure it out with their help. But for the final lab, of which now will be graded based on accuracy, I was not allowed any help from peers, books, or TAs.

I was literally screwed.

There is no other word for it.

Now, this would have been bad enough.

But NO.

On Friday, I planned on spending the whole day (literally) on this lab (knowing how much rides on its accuracy). So I got to the HBLL (Harold B. Lee Library for those of you who don't know BYU lingo/buildings) at 10am and started working. I was proud of myself. I wasn't doing too bad on the lab. I felt like I was doing everything correctly.

And then...at 1:45pm mst, the library computer crashed.

CRASHED!

And I had not saved anything... (I know I know. Stupid me. But the library computers NEVER give me any problems!)

The IT guys did all they could, but couldn't recover any of my work on the lab.

Hence, at 2pm mst, I angrily left campus and went home with the intent of sitting on the couch, eating cookie dough, and watching a movie to forget about my horrible day.

However, I couldn't forget about the lab. A lot of my grade depended on that stupid lab. So, Saturday after work, I went back to the library and spent hours there until midnight (when it inconveniently closed). I finished it, albeit not with the same patience I had the previous day, nor the same accuracy (I was sooo mad!!).

So, I took the final today at 7am.

I don't know my grade officially.

But I failed it.

My one solace in all of this?

If I fail the test hardcore, I still get a C- in the class.

This is good.

Why?

Because even though it will bring my GPA down, I don't have to retake the class.

And that is all that matters.

you know you're po' when... (installment 1)

I'm so po' i can't even afford the "or" on the end of "poor."

How do I know this?

This summer, gas prices were a PAIN.



And although it was expensive, I was working fulltime and it all worked out.

Then, October hit, and prices dropped drastically in 3 weeks.


And since then, it has continued to drop (I've seen as low as $1.35 in some places in Provo and Orem, UT).

And yet, today, I had to fork out $10.

For this:


Because I was so po', my car had been running on fumes for 4 days. Fortunately, I made it to school in time for my final without any mishaps. It wasn't until mid-afternoon when I was trying to go home that my car wouldn't start because it had no food. Hence, the 2 gallon gas can which I now own in case I don't happen to learn from my mistake.





Oh boy. The life of a po' college student.

13 December 2008

there's so much to be thankful for


So I, of course, have been enjoying the chance to listen to Christmas music. This season is the first season I have owned Josh Groban's "Noel" CD. Amaaazing. This is my favorite song. It's called "Thankful" and I think it is appropriate for the holiday season. Enjoy the lyrics! (You should listen to it too.. its absolutely beautiful. Gives me chills every time).


"Some days we forget to look around us.
Some days we can't see the joy that surrounds us.
So caught up inside ourselves
We take when we should give.

So for tonight we pray for
What we know can be.
And on this day we hope for
What we still can't see.

It's up to us to be the change.
And even though we all can still do more--
There's so much to be thankful for.

Look beyond ourselves, there's so much sorrow.
It's way too late to say I'll cry tomorrow.
Each of us must find our truth.
We're so long overdue.

So for tonight we pray for
What we know can be.
And on this day we hope for
What we still can't see.

It's up to us to be the change.
And even though we all can still do more--
There's so much to be thankful for.

Even with our differences
There is a place we're all connected.
Each of us can find each other's love.

So for tonight we pray for
What we know can be.
And on this day we hope for
What we still can't see.

It's up to us to be the change.
And even though the world needs so much more,
There's so much to be thankful for."

"We are at home again. We are exhausted..." --Mark Twain

Mark Twain said this. And I can't wait to agree with him on Wednesday Dec 17th at 11am mst.

"We are at home again. We are exhausted...We have full comfort in one reflection, however. Our experiences...have taught us that in time this fatigue will be forgotten;...--and then, all that will be left will be pleasant memories...memories we shall call up with always increasing interest as the years go by, memories which some day will become all beautiful when the last annoyance that encumbers them shall have faded out of our minds never again to return. School-boy days are no happier than the days of after life, but we look back upon them regretfully because we have forgotten our punishments at school, and how we grieved when our marbles were lost and our kites destroyed--because we have forgotten all the sorrows and privations of that canonized epoch and remember only its orchard robberies, its wooden sword pageants and its fishing holidays. We are satisfied. We can wait. Our reward will come.

To us...to-day's experiences will be an enchanted memory a year hence--memory which money could not buy from us."

I'm not quite home yet. But I am already exhausted.

03 December 2008

temple open house


Salt Lake has 2 temples!! Draper is basically all built now and the open house starts in January. And I reserved tickets for me and several members of the Ogles clan here in Utah (my mom's side of the family). So I am SUPER excited to go through the Draper Temple! Yay!! Updates next month on how amazing it was!

absurdly late nights

Very tired. I wouldn't normally complain considering my normal bedtime is between 12am and 2am. But last night? I was AT WORK UNTIL 1AM!!! Yes, I am being serious. And since I was wide awake when I got home, I didn't end up going to bed until 4am. I watched Kung Fu Panda ("There is no charge for awesomeness... or attractiveness" hahaha)and made chocolate chip cookies to share with friends. Hence, I am now at work AGAIN just 8 hours after I left. I can't wait to go home tonight.

02 December 2008

joy



Things to be thankful for:

6 more days of class

17 more days until I leave for home

1 more lab

2 more quizzes

2 reading days

2 more days until I retake the GRE


Things to continue to be thankful for:

Where would I be without the gospel? I am thankful for my testimony of the divinity of Jesus Christ and His Atonement. I know my Heavenly Father loves me because He has provided the Book of Mormon and a living prophet, Thomas S. Monson to guide me in the right direction.

There still isn't snow! Hallelujah and knock on wood!

My family is amazing and I love them! They keep me going and are such good examples to me! They also continue to amaze me with all of their talents and personalities. I am getting to know them better each day and I love it. My family also makes me laugh everyday. Who knew my family had such a sense of humor?

I get to go to BYU. (Go Cougs!) I have parents willing and able to pay for tuition. I got in. And somehow, I am graduating in April. Whew! It's about time!

The sun. Oooo I love the sun. I am a true California Girl.

Granted, I could go on forever--about roommates, friends, work, school, and every other aspect of my life. I'm so happy to be who I am!

christmas spirit



I am one of those people who generally hates listening to Christmas music before Thanksgiving and after New Years. I can't stand the fact that radio stations start playing the music the day after Halloween. And you even see Christmas trees being set up simultaneous to the Halloween decorations being taken down in stores. It usually bothers me. But for some reason, this year, my Christmas spirit snuck up on me. Now, I'm not saying that I have changed. Only to a point--as in a few days before Thanksgiving. =D I had this sudden urge to listen to Mariah Carey--her Christmas album. Love it. I grew up with it and I love it. It's not Christmas without Mariah Carey singing "All I want for Christmas is You" in the background.

Well, my early Christmas spirit can probably be more understood by knowing that I didn't have a Thanksgiving this year. At least, not a real one. My Thanksgiving weekend was chaotic and absolutely extraordinary. I loved every moment. My family came up to Utah for my Aunt's wedding on Friday (yes, the day after Thanksgiving). But since her reception included a dinner, we decided we didn't want to make a huge dinner for the 60-someodd people in my family--TWICE. So we had to forego our Thursday turkey feast. I never had a real Thanksgiving dinner. The reception dinner was exceptional, but the only food of the evening remotely resembling Thanksgiving was the turkey. Oh, don't worry. I got all of my favorites (mashed potatoes, stuffing, sweet potatoes with brown sugar, etc)--I just didn't eat them all on the same day. Literally. I had mashed potatoes on Wed. Sweet potatoes on Thursday. Turkey on Friday and stuffing on Sunday. Such a bizarre Thanksgiving. Hence, the strange Christmas spirit coming on to me early.


One of the things that gets me most excited about Christmas (besides spending a TON of time with my family) is the twinkling lights everywhere. On houses and christmas trees....just everything seems to twinkle.



And on my Thanksgiving weekend, I was able to enjoy an evening stroll with my family around Temple Square in SLC to enjoy the lights. I had so much fun taking pictures and trying to keep my fingers and nose warm. And afterwards, we went out to a late dinner at Zupas where we all had hot soup and panini's. It was delicious!

18 November 2008

three days and counting

It's that time of the year again. It's November, the air is cold, the leaves are falling, and the statues on and around BYU campus are covered in saran wrap. The big game is approaching. BYU (the Lord's University..hahaha) against U of U--that one up in Salt Lake City. (By the way, the saran wrap is to protect the statues from evil U of U pranks that might include spray paint or other types of materials that could ruin them =D).

I am just excited for the BYU football players (who happen to be mostly Tongan, 400 lbs and over 21 years old) to scare those U of U players (who happen to be all freshman and completely breakable) with the Haka.



They even scare little me. =D

twilight premiere

My dear sister Marie, as I believe I have stated before, is spoiled. =D She went to the Twilight Premiere festivities in Westwood last night. Granted, she did not have a ticket. But her (and her friends) intent was to just see the actors and actresses of the movie and enjoy the night life. Now as a 16-year old obsessed with Twilight, of course she was decked out in Twilight stuff--apparently enough so to get attention. So much attention, in fact, that msn.com decided to write an article in which my sister, Marie Sheranian, is quoted. (http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx/?news=340080).

"Marie Sheranian, 16, and Brianna Matheson, 17, came from Simi Valley, Calif., to catch a glimpse of Pattinson, the 22-year-old actor who became a heartthrob after winning the role of Edward. The two "Twilight" fans created T-shirts professing their devotion for Pattinson and brought crates to stand on in hopes of seeing the actor's face — or even the top of his hair — from above the crowd.

'My heart is gonna explode,' Sheranian said from atop a crate."


My first reaction was pure laughter followed by the thought "How embarrassing." Afterwhich, I emailed the link to my parents and my sister Sarah and a few other people to enjoy as well. In addition, I texted Marie to see if she knew that she was in an article. She was not aware of this, apparent by her answer: "Omgomgomgomg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ahhhhh!!!!!!!!!" (I have not altered the number of exclamation points or letters used). However, she did say Brianna (the other girl, a friend of Marie's) was the one that actually said that quote. Which makes me feel a little bit better that my sister is not over-the-top obsessive. Marie was excited to find out she was "quoted" but would have preferred to have had it quoted correctly, since it does make her seem like a love-sick teenager---which she is.

13 November 2008

perpetuating hate and discrimination

Author: Jill (last name unknown)
Subject: you are perpetuating hate and discrimination

"I'm Mormon and I don't hate any group of people or any person for that matter. This link you put on your site: http://www.mormonsstoleourrights.com/ is so objectionable. You know as well as anyone that any person can put together lies on the web without validation. That site is full of lies. You are perpetuating prejudice and hate.

I've enjoyed your blog over the past 2-3 years and really thought that although you were sometimes a tad cruel that you did it all in fun and with a sense of humor and that you had a good heart (as demonstrated by your many attempts to get people to donate to different charities). Now, I have to say, that I don't want to have any part of your "success" and your 9 million pageviews/day (or whatever # it is up to). You have a lot of power to influence people and what they see and read and you are using that power to preach hatred.

Population of California Residents: 38,000,000
California Mormon population: 750,000
California Catholic population: 10,906,992
Democrats in California: 61.01% 6,308,015
Republicans in California: 37.21% 3,849,023
(Mormons are overwhelmingly Conservatives)

The statistics above show clearly that if every Mormon in the state of California voted Yes, and everyone else voted no, the no's would win. This of course suggests that simply the vast majority of all of Californians voted yes again to keep the concept of marriage, a union between a man and a woman with one of the major goals of procreating and solidifying their union with a child or children.

By being homosexual, as far as I understand it, and please tell me if I am wrong, you go into it with your eyes wide open: No marriage, no offspring, and no tax benefits. You are all basically trying to change the very definition of the word marriage to include something that it has never been. That is like going to an American school and being upset because they don't teach in German-- Ordering a steak and being upset that a chicken dish did not show up at your plate-- Flying on a plane and being upset that you are so high in the sky, and for you Californian's, it is like surfing and being mad that it is wet. The argument seems so absurd.

Webster perhaps said it best, MARRIAGE: the social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies, etc. (Did you know that a straight couple cannot obtain a License of Civil Union? Thus far, there has not been one complaint among them. Perhaps you should picket libraries or Webster's heir's houses.)

To pick one religion that happens to have a difference of opinion than your own flies in the face of everything that you all claim to believe in: the goal of a world where all are accepted for what they are, religion and gays included. You are gay, good for you. Catholics are Catholics and Mormons are Mormons, good for them. There is no benefit to the society of the Earth or the groups whom are gay to pronounce upon them the ability to marry another than that is just what you want. You sound like spoiled rotten kids who are not getting what they want.

You live in the most accepting of gays and lesbian society that has ever existed in all of history. You have every right that everyone else has and the level of persecution that you experience is less than ever before, yet you find ways of poking at the fire. You were granted civil unions and can see loved ones in their hospital rooms and bequeath all of your possessions to each other and adopt children and display yourselves in all your glory in clubs, parades, government, politics, newspapers, websites, etc. It just seems that you will never be happy until and unless you are successful in destroying the very culture that made all the above rights possible; this seems cannibalistic on some level. We have fought for and many have died for the rights that you now enjoy, but this agenda of unsatisfactorily depicting the Mormons for all of your woes is absurd and perpetuates hate on every level. Hypocrisy, at times, creeps silently; this is not one of those times.

You have every right to picket and speak your mind according to your desires, but to openly display the disgusting behavior that I witnessed on the news in front of what the Mormons believe to be one of the most holy places on earth, screams volumes of the level of class that you must possess. I liken it to a war protester shouting over the preacher at a military funeral while the family cries over their loss, or defecating on a Buddhist temple. I am not in the military and I am not Buddhist, but class is class and no class is not cool.

It just seems that your first battle would be more judiciously prudent to focus on obtaining better rights and expanded acceptance of civil unions before you attempt to do away with Santa and trick-or-treating.

To suggest that a religion should lose their tax exempt status is a very slippery slope, one that could backfire without impunity. Mormons do not preach politics from the pulpit and the only money they spent on this entire issue is the amount it cost to fly a few dignitaries to an interview. The quotes that I have heard that the church has spent tens of millions of dollars on this Prop 8 issue is absurd. Ironically you referenced one Mormon, Steve Young's wife, who spent 50k against it (your side) and although you attempted to reference every other fact with varying degrees of success (mostly irrelevant and capricious) you failed to reference any documentation on any facts pertaining to the Church spending a dime on this issue. To suggest that you, as a group, have determined that this is the issue of issues in a time when everything in the country is falling apart, again screams volumes. Every moral fiber that seems to be in the gay and lesbian population seems to simply be to buck the system and cause controversy, convey hatred, decry inequality and reverse all of our traditions. This is deplorable. At some point you are simply taking a Machiavellian approach that will ultimately do more harm than good to your cause.

To begin to suggest that the history of the Mormons in this country can be compared to the plight of the gay community is laughable. The Mormons are one of the first true American religions (meaning it was started here). They defined the original Bill of Rights in their actions and for it were murdered, hunted and had hundreds of millions of dollars of cash, land and property stolen by individuals, cities, counties, states and even the military of the U.S. and were forced to flea out of the country to Mexico (Utah now) just to survive. At the time the concept of polygamy was not new and not illegal. When it became illegal, instead of being grandfathered in like in every other situation before and since would have been, those who practiced it, (Not even close to being all Mormons) were again forced to abandon their children and wives, or leave the country to Old Mexico (where it was not illegal). The Mormons are a God fearing, law abiding group of people who have risen to the highest levels of every political affiliation and office and every industry on earth. They have become the 4th largest religion in America, and spend more on relief than any other religion on Earth and have been persecuted to the nth degree for it. They also have one more claim to fame for being one of the most persecuted people in American history, right up there with the American slaves, and yet they happen to be the only persecuted people that has never requested, hinted, or demanded reparations for what they went through. Talk about speaking volumes...

It is disturbing that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is being singled out for speaking up as part of its democratic right in a free election.

Members of the Church in California and millions of others from every faith, ethnicity and political affiliation who voted for Proposition 8 exercised the most sacrosanct and individual rights in the United States -- that of free expression and voting.

While those who disagree with our position on Proposition 8 have the right to make their feelings known, it is wrong to target the Church and its sacred places of worship for being part of the democratic process.

Once again, we call on those involved in the debate over same-sex marriage to act in a spirit of mutual respect and civility towards each other. No one on either side of the question should be vilified, harassed or subject to erroneous information.

Please see the Catholic Church's opinion on the subject:

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_10937437

I know you do not care that one Mormon will never view your website again, but I definitely felt like I had to say something.

Jill


I don't have much to say, but it makes me sick that this is just one of the many members of the church who have had to stand up for our right to believe as we do, and to vote as we did. There has been so much slander, hatred and erroneous remarks and calumny that has been thrown our way since the election's outcome. And it is so disappointing that the opposing sides can't disagree in a more modern, tolerant, accepting manner--the same manner in which the gay community wishes to be accepted--the same manner in which every other minority in America still wishes to be accepted. In the same moment of history when the United States of America shows the world that we can vote overwhelmingly for a black president, we find that the same problems that caused oppression and delayed Civil Rights are still alive and strong. Voting for President-elect Obama was just one small step forward. And then there was a small step backwards with the unfortunate, violent events following the passing of prop 8.

aftermath of yes on prop 8

By Lara Kerr

November 6, 2008

"Ah, the lessons we learn about ourselves when we are in pain. Hundreds of thousands of "no on 8-ers" are puzzled and hurting, struck by what they perceive as a resounding slap. In utter sincerity, they ask, "Where is the harm in it?" They cannot see the pitfalls, and because they can't, they shrink in revulsion and swallow the proffered lie that a "yes on 8" vote means a "no" vote for gays as people. Their painful question resounds: "Where's the harm?"

Yet less than 48 hours since Proposition 8 passed in California , the answers to that plaintive question begin to emerge. A people who've longed to be seen as harmless and peaceable came forth en masse and disturbed the peace of those who also voted from their hearts, just as passionately, and with just the same desire to promote right. With the first angrily-scrawled picket sign, ugly seeds were strewn; and they're quickly taking root.

Heedless of the needs of innocent drivers and their schedules and worries, people swarmed into the street, effectively proclaiming, "My needs trump yours". That was a small selfishness, but it was a beginning. It grew. Police resources were siphoned away from averting existing dangers, and who can catalog the pain that ensued when cries for help went unanswered, or when help was delayed?

Some protestors marched on the short access road to private property: a holy place for millions, some of whom chose to vote no on 8. The crowd spat. They profaned. They shouted and raged, but no matter, because the people they bullied disagree with them. And so it became acceptable to mock and malign.

They came back the next day, emboldened and angry, although there had been no retaliation, no rebuttal in kind. (In fact, the opposing campaign was markedly void of contention, derision, or hate.) Shrieking and hurling obscenities, even making a mockery of things sacred to others, they flung their vitriol at peaceable people who spoke no ugliness but who simply stood up for their beliefs and voted their consciences.

Watching the news, we could quickly see the harm; and nothing in their behavior demonstrated anything else but the intent to force into our lives their "rights', even if those rights infringe on children's rights to innocence, parents' rights to teach the things they embrace as sacred, or workers' rights to refuse to perform actions and speak words that are in violation of their beliefs. It speaks volumes when someone, even in rage and pain, is capable of viciousness, of force. In the moment that they turned their anger into active, undulating hatred, their true colors emerged. If within hours of an election people use brute force and intimidation to further their agenda, then what else will they do? What else will they demand? Who else will they terrorize into compliance? The forecast is tragedy.

If people are so quick to denigrate, deride, and blame an entire ethnicity that was but a tiny part of a vote, then what hypocrisy! The insistence on silencing those of opposing views borders on fascism. I stand stunned, because this mob mentality is in stark contrast to the gentleness I thought I'd felt from the gay community. So, to those who sincerely ask, "Where's the harm?" I answer sadly, 'It's in the headlines'."


I agree with Lara Kerr. But I also have to add my feelings towards the gay community. I am not gay. But I am trying to understand and be empathetic towards those who voted no on proposition 8. I know that many are feeling pain and anger because of the outcome. I know that they voted no on prop 8 with the same conviction and passion as those who voted yes. And I want to respect their vote and their pain. But I am torn, because although I respect their pain and even their anger, I don't respect the consequenting actions against my religion and against my personal right to vote.

I have been called a bigot more than once by those voting no on 8. And yet, my response is, "Who is the bigot?"--I think that gays should have the right to be gay. They should have the same standard rights of a married heterosexual couple. They should have the right to vote and express their feelings. But when that same gay community for which I respect, tries to force their beliefs down my throat and make it impossible for me to vote and believe the way I want to believe, my respect for those angry people goes out the window. They have the right to protest, even to begin to work on a way to overthrow the election's outcome. But they do not have the right to suffocate our belief system. Again, who is being the bigot? The person peaceably voting as they believe and, after winning, celebrating silently without rubbing in a victory that makes us want to dance in the streets? Or is it the person forcing their beliefs down another's throat instead of agreeing to disagree and even further, disrespecting the majority vote by targeting specific minority groups who voted yes and daring to belittle their sacred beliefs? I may not agree with the gay community. I may not agree with their lifestyle. But I would not attempt to make them feel insignificant; to make them feel less like a human being; to belittle their right as a citizen of the United States to believe and vote as they choose to. If it seems that that was my intention by voting yes, you are wrong. I voted as I thought fit, as my beliefs and heart felt was the right decision--just as the gay community voted as their beliefs and hearts felt was the right decision. We will always disagree and we will always feel like either way, one of our sides is losing an inalienable right. Therefore, we need to respect the votes--as each individual, (no entities) voted as they saw fit.

In addition, I just have to add that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints did not fund any amount of money OR vote in the election. It is an entity. It does not have the right to vote in an election. It was members--only SOME of the 750,000 Mormon members in California--who voted yes on 8--members who have the individual right and responsibility to vote as their heart pleases, just as the 35,000,000 other California residents (Catholic, Black, Hispanic, gay, Republican and Democratic alike) who have the same equal right to vote as their heart leads them to vote.

07 November 2008

Fav Parts of our President-elect's Speech

BEGINNING

"Hello, Chicago.

If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.

It's the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen, by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different, that their voices could be that difference.

It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled. Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been just a collection of individuals or a collection of red states and blue states.

We are, and always will be, the United States of America."

MIDDLE

"Let's remember that it was a man from this state who first carried the banner of the Republican Party to the White House, a party founded on the values of self-reliance and individual liberty and national unity.

Those are values that we all share. And while the Democratic Party has won a great victory tonight, we do so with a measure of humility and determination to heal the divides that have held back our progress.

As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours, 'we are not enemies but friends. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection.'"

MIDDLE

"To those -- to those who would tear the world down: We will defeat you. To those who seek peace and security: We support you. And to all those who have wondered if America's beacon still burns as bright: Tonight we proved once more that the true strength of our nation comes not from the might of our arms or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring power of our ideals: democracy, liberty, opportunity and unyielding hope.

That's the true genius of America: that America can change. Our union can be perfected. What we've already achieved gives us hope for what we can and must achieve tomorrow."

END

"This election had many firsts and many stories that will be told for generations. But one that's on my mind tonight's about a woman who cast her ballot in Atlanta. She's a lot like the millions of others who stood in line to make their voice heard in this election except for one thing: Ann Nixon Cooper is 106 years old.

She was born just a generation past slavery; a time when there were no cars on the road or planes in the sky; when someone like her couldn't vote for two reasons -- because she was a woman and because of the color of her skin.

And tonight, I think about all that she's seen throughout her century in America -- the heartache and the hope; the struggle and the progress; the times we were told that we can't, and the people who pressed on with that American creed: Yes we can.

At a time when women's voices were silenced and their hopes dismissed, she lived to see them stand up and speak out and reach for the ballot. Yes we can.

When there was despair in the dust bowl and depression across the land, she saw a nation conquer fear itself with a New Deal, new jobs, a new sense of common purpose. Yes we can.

When the bombs fell on our harbor and tyranny threatened the world, she was there to witness a generation rise to greatness and a democracy was saved. Yes we can.

She was there for the buses in Montgomery, the hoses in Birmingham, a bridge in Selma, and a preacher from Atlanta who told a people that "We Shall Overcome." Yes we can.

A man touched down on the moon, a wall came down in Berlin, a world was connected by our own science and imagination.

And this year, in this election, she touched her finger to a screen, and cast her vote, because after 106 years in America, through the best of times and the darkest of hours, she knows how America can change.

Yes we can.

America, we have come so far. We have seen so much. But there is so much more to do. So tonight, let us ask ourselves -- if our children should live to see the next century; if my daughters should be so lucky to live as long as Ann Nixon Cooper, what change will they see? What progress will we have made?

This is our chance to answer that call. This is our moment.

This is our time, to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids; to restore prosperity and promote the cause of peace; to reclaim the American dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth, that, out of many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope. And where we are met with cynicism and doubts and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes, we can.

Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America."

-President-elect Barack Obama

15 October 2008

"If you never change your mind, why have one?" - Edward de Bono

So my Dad was really funny the other day. I'm still laughing about it.

Marie (little sister): So guess what?
Daddy: What?
Marie: Today at school, some people had their tail-lights smashed in because they had a VOTE YES ON PROP 8 bumper sticker.
Daddy: Are you kidding me?
Marie: No. They really had their tail-lights smashed in.
Daddy: That's it! (angry voice).
Daddy action-- pulled out a bumper sticker, walked out to his car, and he put it on!!!

Now, for those of you who do not know my father, you need to realize what a momentous moment this actually is. My father is against bumper stickers in every way, mean and manner. He is against their very nature and existence and sees no point. Even when my siblings and I were honor students and begged my dad to put the bumper sticker on his car, he would refuse (politely) and say that he would brag about us in other ways. And yet, Proposition 8 changed his mind! hahahaha. Oh man. I can't even tell you how funny I think that is. He got angry enough to change his mind about bumper stickers. I think what is going through his mind at this point is, "Oh yeah? I can't WAIT until someone breaks my tail-lights. They won't know what hit them."

30 September 2008

SUPPORT Proposition 8

Some of you Californians might get mad when you read this rebuttal by Morris A. Thurston to the "Six Consequences if Proposition 8 Fails."

Now, I am in complete support of Proposition 8. The reason for posting this and supporting the rebuttal by Mr. Thurston is because if we are going to have Prop 8 pass, I want to be able to influence people's personal opinions by teaching them about the importance of the family unit--a mother and a father together as the parents. I want to inform them about the sanctity of marriage. I do not want to scare or panic them with false consequences. So let's be honest. Let's find better ways to support and rally for Proposition 8--which definitely could be a step closer to changing the world if we can pass it.

Bio: Morris Thurston received his undergraduate degree in political science from BYU and his law degree from Harvard Law School. He recently retired as a senior partner with a global law firm, where he specialized in litigation and intellectual property law. He is a legal consultant to the Joseph Smith Papers Project, an adjunct professor at BYU Law School and co‐author (with his wife) of the recently published book “Breathe Life into Your Life Story: How to Write a Story People Will Want to Read.” He is an active member of the LDS Church.

"An anonymously-authored document titled “Six Consequences the Coalition Has Identified if Proposition 8 Fails” is currently being distributed by a coalition of churches and other organizations in support of Proposition 8, an initiative on the November 2008 California ballot. The intent of Proposition 8 is to overturn the California Supreme Court’s ruling allowing homosexuals to marry.

Most of the arguments contained in “Six Consequences” are either untrue or misleading. The following commentary addresses those arguments and explains how they are based on misinterpretations of law and fact. My intent is to be of service in helping our Church avoid charges of using falsehoods to gain a political victory. I do not believe these so”called “consequences” have originated at or been approved by Church headquarters; rather, I suspect they are the result of overzealous volunteers who have misinterpreted California law and the legal cases on which the supposed consequences depend. Relying on deceptive arguments is not only contrary to gospel principles, but ultimately works against the very mission of the Church.

1. Children in public schools will have to be taught that same-sex marriage is just as good as traditional marriage. The California Education Code already requires that health education classes instruct children about marriage. (#51890) Therefore, unless Proposition 8 passes, children will be taught that marriage is between any two adults regardless of gender. There will be serious clashes between the secular school system and the right of parents to teach their children their own values and beliefs.

"Response: This is untrue. California Education Code 51890 provides that "pupils will receive instruction to aid them in making decisions in matters of personal, family, and community health." The focus is on health. The statute provides for community participation, including lectures by practicing professional health and safety personnel from the community. Things that are to be taught include, for example, drug use and misuse, nutrition, exercise, diseases and disorders, environmental health and safety, as well as "family health and child development, including the legal and financial aspects and responsibilities of marriage and parenthood."

"Another section of the Education Code (51933) deals with comprehensive sexual health education and HIV/AIDS prevention. It provides that instruction shall be age appropriate and medically accurate, shall teach "respect for marriage and committed relationships," and shall encourage a pupil to communicate with his or her parents about human sexuality.

"Therefore, no provision of the Education Code requires any teacher to teach that same-sex marriage is "just as good" as traditional marriage. Teachers are to teach respect for marriage and committed relationships, and Proposition 8 will not change this law."


2. Churches may be sued over their tax exempt status if they refuse to allow same-sex marriage ceremonies in their religious buildings open to the public. Ask whether your pastor, priest, minister, bishop, or rabbi is ready to perform such marriages in your chapels and sanctuaries.

"Response: This false 'consequence' is based on the misrepresentation of a case in New Jersey involving an association affiliated with the Methodist Church. In considering this case, it is important to remember that New Jersey does not permit gay marriage, so that case had nothing to do with Proposition 8.

"What was the New Jersey case about? The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association (OGCMA), a Methodist organization, had taken advantage of a New Jersey law granting a state property tax exemption for a pavilion in the seaside town of Ocean Grove that was dedicated for public use. Note that the case did not involve income tax exemptions and note that the purpose for giving the exemption in the first place was to reward organizations for opening their buildings and facilities for public use.

"The property in question was a boardwalk pavilion open to the public. Bands play there. Children skateboard through it. Tourists enjoy the shade. It's even been used for debates and Civil War re-enactments. It was also available to be reserved for marriage ceremonies by people of any faith. Nevertheless, the OGCMA wanted to prohibit a gay commitment ceremony (not a marriage ceremony) from being held in the pavilion. The New Jersey real estate commission ruled that if OGCMA intended to claim a property tax exemption for a building open to the public, they could not discriminate. Seen in this light, it was a sensible ruling. Implicit in the ruling is that the group could discriminate if they ceased to claim a property tax exemption for a public facility. It is important to note that this ruling pertained only to the pavilion, which constituted a mere one percent of the property the OGCMA owned. The total amount of additional tax assessed was $200. The OGCMA continues to receive a property tax exemption for the remaining 99% of its property.

"This case has nothing at all to do with any Mormons, Catholic or any other church's chapel or sanctuary that is used for religious purposes. It has nothing to do with any church's income tax exemption. To my knowledge, the Mormon Church has never sought to take advantage of a property tax exemption similar to the New Jersey exemption and likely never would.

"The California Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage cannot have any federal tax consequences, and the Court so noted explicitly in its decision. The Supreme Court also noted that its ruling would not require any priest, rabbi or minister to perform gay marriages, which should be self-evident because of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion."


3. Religious adoption agencies will be challenged by government agencies to give up their long-held right to place children only in homes with both a mother and a father. Catholic Charities in Boston already closer its doors in Massachusetts because courts legalized same-sex marriage there.

"Response: Another misrepresentation. To begin with, it should be noted that Catholic Charities in Boston was not forced to close its doors--indeed it is still very active. (See its website at www.ccab.org.) Rather, Catholic Charities voluntarily ceased providing adoption service in Massachusetts. According to the Boston Globe, Catholic Charities elected to close its doors in protest over the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts and because it was reluctant to undertake a lawsuit that might be lost.

"LDS Family Services still operates in Massachusetts, as it does in California. There are several differences between LDSFS and Catholic Charities. LDSFS does not take federal and state funds; Catholic Charities does. LDSFS facilities only voluntary adoptions and permits the birth mother to approve the adoptive parents. Catholic Charities handled non-voluntary adoptions (where the state seizes the children) and normally did not accommodate birth mother approval. Catholic Charities had contracts with the state and was, in effect, acting as an agent of the state. LDSFS does not. To date, LDS Family Services has never been forced to place any children with a gay couple, and has never been sued for not doing so.

"If this situation ever faces a legal challenge in California, it will not matter whether Proposition 8 passes because California already has on its books (and has for several years) laws granting domestic partners (homosexual and heterosexual) the same civil rights as married couples. This is a point that many people seem not to understand. Here is the language of just one California statute: 'Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under the law, whether they derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provision or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.'

"Therefore, the passage or failure of Proposition 8 will have no effect on the placement of orphans with gay couples in California."

4. Religions that sponsor private schools with married student housing may be required to provide housing for same-sex couples, even if counter to church doctrine, or risk lawsuits over tax exemptions and related benefits.

"Response: This claim relates to an experience at Yeshiva University in New York. Gay students were eligible for University housing, but their partners were not able to join them because they did not have marriage certificates. It should be noted that Yeshiva University (despite its name) is chartered as a nonsectarian institution, enabling it to receive state and federal funding. The New York court found that Yeshiva was discriminating against the students based on their sexual orientation--not their marital status. The rules was based on New York City non-discrimination laws.

"California's existing non-discrimination laws give all registered domestic partners, whether heterosexual or homosexual, the right of equal access to family housing. To date, however, no California private religious school has been forced to comply with this law. Neither the passage nor the failure of Proposition 8 will have any bearing on the law relating to family student housing in California.

"The gay marriage problem will not arise at BYU and other Church universities because engaging in homosexual activity is a violation of the honor code and is a basis for expulsion from the University. There rules will not be overturned merely because California recognizes gay marriages, any more than they have been because Massachusetts, Canada and many European nations recognize them."


5. Ministers who preach against same-sex marriages may be sued for hate speech and risk government fins. It already happened in Canada, a country that legalized gay marriage. A recent California court held that municipal employees may not say: 'traditional marriage,' or 'family values' because, after the same-sex marriage case, it is 'hate speech.'

"Response: Of course, anyone can be 'sued' for anything, but no minister has been convicted of a crime in Canada or the United States for preaching against same-sex marriages. The Owens case, on which this statement is based, was brought well before gay marriage was legal in Canada and did not involve a minister, but a private citizen. In that case, a man name Hugh Owens produced bumper stickers and took okut an ad that depicted two stick figures holding hands, covered by a circle and a slash, along with a reference to a passage in Leviticus that says that a man engaging in homosexual activity 'shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' The lower court ruled that this amounted to hate speech, but the decision was overturned in review. The current Canadian law on hate propaganda excludes any speech if it is spoken during a private conversation or if the person uttering the speech 'is attempting in good faith to establish by argument an opinion on a religious subject.' Thus, even ministers who preach against same-sex marriages in Canada have no risk of legal liability or government fines.

"This would never be an issue in the United States because we have far more liberal freedom of speech and religion laws than does Canada. There has been no hate speech lawsuits in Massachusetts, which has been a gay marriage state for four years.

"The description of a recent California case is another fabrication. This case is Good News Employee Association v. Hicks, which was decided before the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage and so it, too, has nothing to do with Proposition 8. The plaintiffs in that case were evangelical Christians (not homosexuals) who posted flyers around the offices of the Oakland Community and Economic Development Agency promoting their "Good News Association" and calling on those who read the flyer to 'preserve our workplace with integrity...with respect for the natural family, marriage and family values.' In other words, this group was promoting the idea of ridding their workplace of gay people--a blatantly homophobic message and highly offensive not only to several gay people who work there but to heterosexual co-workers as well. The supervisors removed the flyers. The Good News people sued, claiming their rights of free speech were violated. The court found that the agency was entitled to eliminate the workplace disruption the flyers were causing and noted that there were many other ways for this group to promote their message without resorting to such offensive tactics.

"This case does not hold that municipal employees are prohibited from saying 'traditional marriage' or 'family values' and it has nothing to do with gay marriage, or ministers preaching, or Proposition 8. Indeed, the court specifically found that there were many other ways for these people to get their message out without disrupting the workplace by creating an atmosphere of persecution."

6. It will cost you money. This change in the definition of marriage will bring a cascade of lawsuits, including some already lost (e.g., photographers cannot now refuse to photograph gay marriages, doctors cannot refuse to perform artificial insemination of gays even given other willing doctors). Even if courts eventually find in favor of a defender of traditional marriage (highly improbable given today's activist judges), think of the money--your money--that will be spent on such legal battles.

"Response: The argument concerning cost is fallacious and calculated to engender fear. In actuality, the net fiscal effect of Proposition 8 will be an influx or revenue to California because of the anticipated increase in marriage ceremonies and the related boon to the economy. The change in the definition of marriage will not bring a 'cascade of lawsuits' because heterosexual and homosexual registered domestic partners already have all the rights of married couples in California. None of the lawsuits alluded to in this paragraph has anything to do with gay marriage.

"The wedding photographer case was in New Mexico, a state that has no gay marriage law. The medical doctor case was in California, but was based on our existing non-discrimination laws and would not be affected one way or the other by the passage of Proposition 8.

In the California case, a medical clinic that provided intrauterine insemination (IUI) to its patients, refused to treat one of them because she was a lesbian. California's broad anti-discrimination laws expressly ban discrimination by any business establishment that offers to the public 'accomodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services.' This statute bans discrimination against individual heterosexuals and homosexuals alike, as well as married people and domestic partners. Therefore, the clinic had the option of either having a doctor on staff who would perform IUI services on a non-discriminatory basis, or cease performing the services at all. Whether we agree with the decision or not, the fact that the law upon which the ruling was based will not be affected by the passage of Proposition 8, so there is no 'consequence' if the proposition fails.

"The gratuitous comment concerning 'activist judges' seems to be framed as an appeal to fear and paranoia. In fact, however, today's justices on both the California Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court can hardly be called 'activist.' Six of the seven justices of the California Supreme Court were appointed by Republican governors; seven of the nine justices of the United State Supreme Court were appointed by Republican presidents. Most legal scholars would agree that they are moderate to conservative in their leanings and have a healthy respect for constitutional principles. The California Supreme Court has a high reputation throughout the land. A recent study indicates that its decisions are approved of and followed by out-of-state courts far more than are the decisions of any other supreme court in the United States.

"Ronald M. George, the chief justice of the California Supreme Court, who wrote the opinion for the majority in the marriage cases, is a judicial moderate who was never considered to be an activist judge. He has an outstanding scholarly background (Princeton and Stanford) and worked as a prosecutor immediately after graduating from law school. He was appointed a Superior Court judge at the early age of 32 by Republican Governor Ronald Reagan. Though young, he quickly gained a reputation as fair-minded, insightful, hard working and tough on crime. He was widely praised for his handling of the difficult trial of the Hillside Strangler, Angelo Buono. He rose in the ranks of judges until he was appointed to the California Supreme Court by Republican Governor Pete Wilson.

"As Justice George considered the marriage cases, the decision 'weighed heavily' on his mind. He remembered a long ago trip he made with his European immigrant parents through the American South. There, the signs warning 'No Negro' or 'No colored' left 'quite an indelible impression on me,' he recalled. As a judicial conservative, it would have been safest for him to vote against the petitioners and avoid the backlash that he knew would come. But, as he put it in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, 'I think there are times when doing the right thing means not playing it safe.'

"The function of judges is to evaluate cases before them and apply constitutional principles to assure the minorities, as well as majorities, receive justice. In controversial cases they are bound to anger some portion of the electorate regardless of how they vote. Their unenviable job is to ignore public opinion and apply the law as they see it. Some decisions are so difficult that reasonable minds can differ. The Supreme Court decision in the marriage cases was that sort of decision. Nevertheless, four of the seven justices on what is considered a moderate to conservative court agree on the verdict that was rendered. This decision cannot be written off as merely the whim of 'activist judges.'

"Conclusion: In summary, the arguments used in 'Six Consequences If Proposition 8 Fails' are false, misleading, and based on faulty logic. Almost every legal case alluded to is misrepresented. The passage or failure of Proposition 8 will not affect any of the scenarios posed by this document; all of the so-called 'adverse consequences' are illusory."

18 September 2008

"Spend 8 continuous hours banging your head against a brick wall. If you find you enjoyed that activity, then you should carry on in grad school."

So... CHANGE OF PLANS.

I am now applying for graduate school to start Fall of 2009, INSTEAD OF Fall of 2010.

WHAT AM I THINKING??? Apparently, according to the quote above, I must be a masochist.

Now my mind is filled with:

Due dates
Letters of recommendation
Letters of intent
Writing samples
Application fees
Lack of finances
GRE scores
Lack of finances
Grade point averages
Clinical Programs
Lack of finances
Scholarships
Grants
Fellowships
Internships
I'm poor
I'm poor
I'm poor

GOOD NEWS:

I narrowed it down to FIVE schools. Count them: FIVE. (Mainly so that I don't have to go without food to afford the application fees--otherwise, I would apply everywhere so that I would have a higher probability of being accepted!)

University of Utah (Salt Lake City, UT)
Utah State University (Logan, UT)
Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ)
Illinois State University (Normal, IL) --I don't even know where Normal is!
Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL)

So... drumroll please. Until March and April, when I will hopefully be receiving more acceptance letters than rejection letters.

tp couture



Us friends are super talented. We created wedding dresses out of toilet paper in two minutes at Jessamin's bridal shower. We could totally be high-end designers, dontcha think?

Jess got married last Saturday and Sandi is still a bride-to-be!

04 September 2008

Sherri made me do it

I got tagged to do it...so...why not?

20 Years Ago. . .
1. I was 1 and happily crawling around on the floor.
2. I stole toys from my sister--hence my parents teaching Sarah how to push.
3. I learned my first word. "NO."
4. I got my first favorite stuffed animal, which I promptly named "Oreo."

10 Years Ago...
1. I moved from LA to Simi Valley, CA.
2. I met my best friend ever, Deveny Downer.
3. I had no sense of fashion whatsoever--I dressed like a boy.
4. I fell in love for the first time--with my best friend's older brother.

5 Years Ago...
1. I came home from a month-long tour of Germany as an exchange-student.
2. I started my junior year at Simi Valley High School.
3. I finally got my license and drove everyday to school, even though I lived a block away (there is a good reason for this: i went to seminary first in the morning, which was a lot further than school).
4. I quit piano.

3 Years Ago...
1. I started my freshman year at BYU! Go Cougs!
2. I found I could function on 3 hours of sleep per night.
3. I met the best roommates ever--and we made a hot tub in our living room.
4. I lost Deveny--because she met a boy!

1 Year Ago...
1. I made new friends and had the best summer of my life.
2. I started working at Prosper.
3. I changed my major to Communication Disorders.
4. I decided I'm going to go to Graduate School.

So far this year I...
1. Found out that my body loves the sun.
2. Traveled to Hawaii and had a glorious vacation with my entire family.
3. Started my senior year at BYU.
4. Lost 26 friends to marriage. I counted. And I'm not lying.

Yesterday I...
1. Went to class.
2. Went to work.
3. Killed myself working out under the watchful eye of my trainer, Jess Brereton.
4. Found out I get a new phone--the BlackBerry Curve!!

Today I...
1. Slept in longer than I should have.
2. Went to class.
3. Went to work.
4. Ran into some of my freshman boys who are just home from their mission!

Tomorrow I will...
1. Take my car to get the stupid door handle fixed.
2. Decorate my apt with my new roommate, Ashley.
3. Probably go to Melissa and Daniel's apt and play Chicken Foot Dominoes.
4. Do my homework.....hopefully.

In the next year I will....
1. Find out where I got into grad school.
2. Move to a different state.
3. Find a husband?
4. Graduate from BYU with a BS in Communication Disorders!




I tag Deveny, Sarah, JSchro and Milan.

19 August 2008

flashback

...ok, so I think I skipped over a few crucial crazy experiences my freshman year of college. I'm not saying that I didn't have my fair share, but it is apparent from my experience last night, that I must have missed something.

I came home to this...


And I didn't know what to say...


But then I gave in to peer pressure...


And they attacked me with makeup...


And dressed me up...


And then we partied on the way to Macy's...


And had a REALLY


FUN


NIGHT

olympics



I just have to say that I think he is AMAZING and so much fun to watch. He is cute, (even with his cheezy crooked grin) and he has an AMAZING body and AMAZING talent. It is so exciting to watch the olympics. I always get crazy when I watch races. It's the only time I get into sports. For real.

The one thing that bothers me about the media covering the olympics, aka covering the swim meets, is that they always cut straight to Michael Phelps (which, technically, I don't mind so much)--and they ignore his teammates, who without, to be honest, Phelps would not have succeeded in receiving all the golds/world records. And then they always cut to his mom's reaction. *Gag* Ok, let's get serious. I really don't like his mom! She annoys me--her reactions are all the same. Goodness gracious!

But I DO love the olympics! And I always will!

BEST vacation EVER

I dare anyone to disagree.

I will tell you why.




Me


And my entire family


Staying at a beach house


With a gorgeous view.


Even though our beach had Portuguese Manowars
("I shall call you squishy, and you shall be my squishy.")


We also had a few turtles who liked to hang out too.


I surfed,


Snorkeled,


Swam with dolphins,


Embraced Buddha,


Visited Pearl Harbor,


Got attacked by coral,


Got a tattoo,


And got lei'd.










All for free--it will be the only vacation I will have done everything I absolutely wanted to do, and not pay a dime. I love family vacations.

29 July 2008

breaking dawn


At dawn on Saturday August 2nd, I know exactly where I will be: on my couch, with bleary, red-splotched, drooping eyes and barely enough energy to hold up THE book of the summer--Stephenie Meyer's very own "BREAKING DAWN." I am so super excited about this. I had a book on reserve until I realized that I would not be in Provo when it came out. I will actually be in California. And so, I am planning the wonderful midnight excursion with my sister and we will buy the books to entertain us for the following day. (But to be honest, I know that i'm going straight to bed and not staying up until all hours of the morning reading it at the fastest speed possible, because I will be trying with all the will power in my body to postpone those wonderful pages until I am on the plane headed toward the beautiful, tropical island of Oahu). I considered the ups and downs of my decision and realized that if I kept the book for the flight, the six hour trip would then become one long adventure of vampires and werewolves. What could be better?

I have enjoyed the spoilers/quotes Stephenie Meyer has slipped to the public--read to me by my kindred spirits at work who, like me, enjoy Edward and know that our lives have truly been altered because our standards of true love have been changed forever and no real man could ever live up to our expectations. So sad that a YA book could do that to all girls from ages 10-25. Who knew that Stephenie Meyer could be so talented that she could have her books appeal to such a range of ages!

As for Team Jacob versus Team Edward, we all know, deep in our hearts,(even the slightly manic ones who actually believe that Bella will end up with Jacob--haha, that's funny), that Stephenie Meyer could not end the book any other way than having Bella become a vampire so that she can live throughout eternity with her true love. And the only way that Jacob can be truly happy is if he imprints on someone--and my lucky guess is that it is Leah. Who else would it be? It would be perfect! And then the ending would be happily ever after--which is the only worthwhile ending to any story. And sadly, I know that if the book doesn't pan out this way, I will be forever aware of the fact that my imagination is superior to that of Stephenie Meyer. =D Just kidding. Even more pathetically, I know that I could never write a novel of this magnitude. She should be proud.